Battleoftrafalgar_2  The Battle of Trafalgar was really the zenith of the fascinating age of fighting sail.  Admiral Viscount Lord Horatio Nelson completed one of his most astonishing annihilations of his French and Spanish adversaries, and was killed in the process.

What Orrin Woodward and I wrote in Launching a Leadership Revolution about Nelson’s victory at the Battle of the Nile a few years prior was also true of his conduct at Trafalgar.  Nelson spent considerable time developing his ship’s captains.  He met with them every chance he got to impart his fighting philosophy unto them.  He held special dinners to get them acquainted with each other to foster better team work.  And most importantly, when the battle had commenced, he turned them loose to fight on their own.  Since battle was confusing and communication was nearly impossible across the smoky water, with the loud cannons roaring almost non-stop, trying to coordinate fleet movements was nearly impossible, anyway.  Nelson’s preference was to rely on the ability of his fighting captains to make their own decisions in the heat of battle and to act on the philosophy he had so painstakingly taught them beforehand.  As his fleet sailed into battle, Nelson’s flag ship made a few signals to coordinate the fleet’s movements as it came into battle.  But once the fighting began, Nelson’s signals changed to those of encouragement to “engage the enemy more closely,” and famously, “England expects every man will do his duty.”

This style of fighting, a significant departure from the standard method of engagement at that time in the Royal Navy, was what Nelson called the “Nelson touch.”  Uniquely, Nelson was the only fleet commander in British history that purposely brought on a “pell-mell” battle and succeeded at it time and again.  The reasons were many.  But primary among them was the fighting initiative of his individual captains.  They clearly knew what Nelson expected of them and they performed accordingly.  Nelson hAbbott2_2ad the master touch of decentralizing his leadership style at the right moment to wreak the most possible destruction on his enemy. 

Perhaps no one summed up the results of the “Nelson touch” quite as well as Vice-Admiral Villeneuve, the French fleet commander that was defeated at Trafalgar.  He was said to have made the following comment after learning of Lord Nelson’s death at the battle:

“To any other Nation the loss of a Nelson would have been irreparable, but in the British Fleet off Cadiz, every Captain was a Nelson.” The Battle of Trafalgar is a prime example of the power of the Fourth Level of Influence.

Posted in

6 responses to “Level Four Leadership – “Every Captain was a Nelson””

  1. Raymond Avatar

    Chris,
    The article on Nelson and his “fighting captains” caused me to think of my own leadership, and if I am first of all operating effectively as a fighting captain, but equally important am I finding and developing captains. My challenge is imparting the loyalty, heart and desire to fight independent of my leadership… I am re-reading the LLR, and praying that my leadership influence can grow to inspire leaders to do their duty… Thanks for the brain food!
    Raymond

    Like

  2. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Raymond:
    You are exactly right. The fourth level of influence, where one develops other leaders, cannot happen until the third level of influence, where one operates as a leader, happens effectively. As we all grow in our leadership ability, we then can get better at compelling and developing other leaders to do the same. It’s a very interesting and rewarding process. And as Nelson demonstrated on more than one occasion, it is also extremely effective!

    Like

  3. Ryan Avatar
    Ryan

    Nelson inspires me because he chose a leadership style that wasn’t conventional. He went against the norms that were followed by fellow Royal Navy commanders. Because he was willing to do this, he won battles that he should have lost. It just makes me think that you cannot stop an idea whose time has come. Thanks for the lesson, Chris!

    Like

  4. Ian Avatar

    Chris,
    i am almost finished with The Starfish and the Spider, i love the comparison the authors uses with the Spainards and the Apaches. It seems to be very similiar to Nelson and his military leadership philosophy. The Apache had their whole society leaning in the way of this thinking.
    It goes to show, if you dont know, you need to grow, or things are going to get harder then you know, then the path to your goal will feel like its in slow mo… that could be a frustrating way to go..you know? =)

    Like

  5. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Ryan and Ian:
    Both of your observations are great. It’s a lot like the U.S. Army’s advertisements that talk about individual soldiers each being “an army of one.” Decentralized methods are very effective when dealing with a highly trained, highly skilled, think-for-themselves group of people. Nelson understood this well, and so, apparently, does the U.S. military. This is where leadership development is clearly necessary. When the correct battle philosophy, skill sets, and leadership abilities can be developed in others, the leadership pipeline becomes fully stocked with capable leaders who can function without the “Admiral” directing their every maneuver. In today’s flat, high-tech, fast-paced world, this type of organization is proving, by far, to be the most effective. This is why the concept of Levels of Influence is so important, and particularly that of Level 4; developing other leaders. Thanks for sharing your comments! It was great hearing from you guys.

    Like

  6. Hughie Bagnell Avatar
    Hughie Bagnell

    Another excellent example of Teamwork, Sincerity, Integrity and Leadership! Thank you for sharing!

    Like

Leave a reply to Chris Brady Cancel reply