Img_rn_pellew             The French Revolution of 1789 had begun on the high ideals of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, but had descended into the Reign of Terror and the guillotine.  Eventually, the more moderate Directory took over the affairs of the country, and set its sights on dominance and dominion. 

In its war with Great Britain, France had seen momentum swing its way. By 1795 it recaptured islands it had lost to the English in the Caribbean, and it had secured three of its borders in mainland Europe. Spain then decided to sign on as an ally of France. With this development, the Royal Navy’s presence in the Mediterranean was threatened, and it was forced to withdraw from those waters for the first time in ages.  This withdrawal forced Britain’s one remaining ally, Austria, to give up hope and sue for peace with France. Now Great Britain stood alone.

            According to Herman, “The Directory sensed final victory. One more blow directed at Britain might do it. But how to bring its invincible army to bear against an enemy protected by the English Channel – and the fleet at Spithead? This was the problem that would perplex and baffle France’s best military minds, including Bonaparte, for more than a decade.  It equally baffled Hitler and his generals in 1940.  Philip II and Louis XIV had each failed to find the solution, even when they enjoyed naval superiority.  There was England with its puny army, its exposed beaches, its capital vulnerable to attack: the last barrier to complete French domination of Europe. Yet it would not give way.”  So the French struck upon an idea to attack the Irish coast, hoping to take advantage of rebel sentiment there and gather an army of Irishmen to assist them in their conquest of England.

            Out of the port of Brest a French squadron of seventeen ships of the line loaded with 15,000 soldiers was dispatched for the attack.  The British had been maintaining a blockade of the harbor, keeping watch on the French fleet and trying to keep it bottled up in port.  The weather, though, had grown harsh, and the ships of the Royal Navy had been blown far off station and out into the Atlantic. Except for one.   

The Indefatigable was only a frigate, not a full size line of battle ship, and was of the class of faster, lighter ships meant for speed and reconnaissance.  Through the foulest weather he could ever remember, Captain Edward Pellew had heroically managed to remain on his station.  He alone was there to spot the large fleet making its way out to sea.

Realizing that there was not enough time to sail out in the Atlantic and alert the British squadron, Pellew seized the initiative.  In the darkness of the night and in a torrential downpour, Pellew immediately sailed his tiny frigate directly into the middle of the French fleet.  As the enormous French battle ships labored to maneuver their way around the rocks and shoals at the mouth of the harbor, Pellew and the Indefatigable deftly sailed amongst them, firing off guns and flares, attempting to imitate the French signals and cause confusion.  Pellew and his tiny ship were everywhere.  The result was chaos.  One of the large battleships, the Seduisant, ran onto the rocks.  Several others were scattered out into the Atlantic, including the one carrying the French admiral and general. 

Pellew had acted courageously and decisively and had demonstrated ingenuity all at the same time.  Pellew’s efforts had caused just enough of a delay.  The French fleet took time to reassemble, and once it did the weather had turned into an ice storm.  The winds were contrary to a landing on the shores of Ireland, and the invasion had to be called off.  The initiative of one leader and his crew had made the difference.

Captain Pellew didn't deliberate in the face of a challenge.  He didn't need to get orders before acting.  He saw what needed to be done, exhibited great courage and ingenuity, and took responsibility to get results.  One leader's initiative made an enormous difference.

Posted in

10 responses to “Captain Pellew and the Indefatigable”

  1. DaveC Avatar
    DaveC

    Chris,
    I have always enjoyed history, especially military history, (although not the way it is taught in most schools, with all the boring memorizing of a bunch of dates and names without the real stories of the people and events behind the history like you and Orrin put at the end of each chapter in Launching a Leadership Revolution) but I am not the student of history that you are. This story sounds to me like Captain Pellew was following the teaching and example of Admiral Nelson as you and Orrin described in Chapter 9 of LLR (easier to say AND type). Is this the case here?
    By the way, I THINK, (and this is not to brag or anything and I am by no means certain) than my wife, who is very interested in genealogy, has discovered that I am somehow related to Admiral Nelson. This seems likely since my paternal grandfather’s middle name was Admiral (both his and my dad’s first names were David, like me, but Dad and I have a differant middle name from Pap), and both the names Admiral and Nelson pop up as first and middle names in my genealogy (although have not seen the names Lord or Horatio, (fortunately???)). I don’t know how relevant all that is, but it is interesting, I think, so I guess I’ll leave in anyway.
    I think I mentioned previously that our book club (I don’t think that is what is technically called, but I forget what it is really called, but that is what it really is to me) will start studing LLR tomorrow night. We will be looking at Chapters one and two. Would you give us a one or more nuggets of what you, as one of the authors, think are the chief points or these chapters. I’ve read them each three times now and plan to do some more studying before tomorrow, but think that some insight from you and Orrin (I plan to ask him the same question in his blog) would be priceless for all of us, and I hope that it will get any of the people at the meeting to get interested in yours and Orrin’s blogs, which I think are really a priceless opportunity, for which I am very, very grateful to you and Orrin for giving to everyone who reads these blogs.
    In previewing this post, I noticed how rambling it seems, but I’m going to leave it as it is since it shows my heart, which is what you want to see, I think.
    DaveC

    Like

  2. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Dave C:
    Great to hear from you again. If you find out that you’re descended from Nelson, do I have to start calling you Sir Dave C.?
    I hope your study of the LLR book goes well. I would be interested in hearing any feedback your group has for us.
    Chapters 1 and 2 will be familiar to you, because I have drawn from the prinicples of those two chapters for most of what has been posted on this blog so far. I think one of the biggest things you’ll get out of these two chapters is the role that hunger plays in leadership success. I know when Orrin Woodward and I were having the original conversation from which this book evolved, hunger was the concept we kept coming back to. Many leadership books don’t even touch on this concept, but it is crucial. There are proper and improper sources of motivation, hunger being a God-given desire to assault the status quo, ambition being a burn for self-aggrandizement. Authentic leaders need to understand their true source of hunger, then stoke the flames of that hunger in the ways we describe in the book. Hunger is a discipline, and it needs to be used and exercised on a regular basis to keep away the temptations of complacency and mediocrity.
    That’s enough for now. Don’t want to give it all away!
    Say hi to those in your study group for me!
    Chris

    Like

  3. DaveC Avatar
    DaveC

    Chris,
    Thanks a lot for the insight. I will say hi to the group for you and will take good notes so that I can fill you in on what feedback the group has for you.
    DaveC

    Like

  4. Ian Avatar

    Chris,
    i like Captain Pellew’s story its an excellent example of:
    -its not the size of the man in the fight but the size of fight in the man.
    -leaders developing leaders, Admiral Nelson to Captain Pellew.
    -Captain Pellew and his crew in keeping the bigger picture (protect Britian) in focus, no matter what the cost/risk (they could of surrendered)
    The more I think about it the more the pricipals of success, character and the standard of ethics across the board in the British Navy (in life also) shine through in this story.
    thanks for writing this up Chris, i see my self as a captain of a frigate letting loose flares and cannon fire on the fleet of complacency and mediocrity setting fire to the sails of the Battleships “Doin pretee Gut” and “La Comfee” To defend my brothers in arms and my countrymen!!!
    Im getting caught up in the story and having fun with it, i do seriously thankyou for doing what you do.

    Like

  5. DaveC Avatar
    DaveC

    Chris,
    Several of the people at the book club (I think technically they are calling it a workshop) seemed eager to start reading yours and Orrin’s Blogs. We only got through chapter one tonight. We talked about the difference between a leader and a manager. A leader must bring about change, while a manager is much more likely to work to preserve the status quo. That is pretty much an oversimplification of our discussion on that but I can’t recall everything that we said and even what I can remember would take way to long to relate. We also discussed the importance of trust and integrity in the leader. Tim, who served in Vietnam, related how a leader in the Army would gain much more respect and co-operation from his men by being honest with them about his mistakes and asking them to make up for his shortcomings than a “leader” who only tried to lead by position and force his will upon his men. I think you are probably familiar with the concept that in a relationship it is a good idea to give the other person a credit of ten chips and give them the benefit of a doubt in this. This is a concept that Mike, the group leader, shared with us from a conversation with Dean. I am probably not explaining that very well, but I am sure you are more framiliar with the concept than I am so you can understand what I mean. We watched a video about a man named Ed Martin, who touched so many lives that his funeral procession was seven miles long. He was a great example of a servant-leader, one who led by example and by being a caring person who affected hundreds of lives positively. We talked about a lot more, but I really don’t think I should take up the space here to say much more (and to be honest I can’t really remember the details just a general impression that tonight was a good time of fellowship and sharing ideas and principles of leadership). Oh, yeah, I also read your thoughts about the importance of hunger and the difference between genuine hunger and selfish ambition. Mike had made a point similar to this as well.
    DaveC

    Like

  6. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Ian:
    I hope you enjoyed reading my article as much as I did your comments! Love the names of the enemy ships! (wish I’d thought of that!) You are exactly right, and have captured the essence of a leader’s initiative. Sail on, my friend, and “all hands beat to quarters, clear all decks,prepare for action!”

    Like

  7. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    DaveC:
    Your workshop sounds wonderful! What great concepts you guys are discussing, and it sounds like your group leader has excellent material and experience to share! I hope you all enjoy studying the LLR book!
    God Bless!
    Chris

    Like

  8. Cathy - Team Rascals Avatar
    Cathy – Team Rascals

    Chris,
    Thank you for sharing that story! While history has been my favorite subject of study (outside of literature), military history was more my late father’s preference than mine. (I’m more into cultural history.) I never heard of Captain Pellew, and am delighted to have met him through your words.

    Like

  9. Lalanne Barber Avatar
    Lalanne Barber

    Just discovered this blog, Chris . . . more, please! I love history, especially illustrations that relate to the principles that we as “commoners” can employ to make it through the seas of adversity in our lives and make a difference for ourselves and others. Thanks for the great history lesson!

    Like

  10. Geneva Avatar

    Thank you Chris for providing another extraordinary history lesson in courage, commitment & how much difference one person can make. Pellew was obviously a servant leader & others focused. He used what he had in the time he had & made a difference instead of an excuse!
    Blessings,
    g

    Like

Leave a reply to Cathy – Team Rascals Cancel reply