The War of 1812 for many was more properly called the Second War for Independence.  The new United States was struggling to make it in the tough world of foreign affairs, and its troubles with England had bubbled up into a war for which the new nation was not ready.

Much of North America was still unsettled, at the time, and the "frontier" was the Ohio valley and the dense forest regions around the Great Lakes.  Control of these inland waterways was critical to control of the frontier territory, and both the United States and England were eager to dominate there. 

Onto this scene sailed a twenty-seven year old American named Oliver Hazad Perry.  In a small, fresh water sailing fleet, Perry engaged the bulk of England’s Great Lakes squadron in what became the Battle of Lake Erie.  Perry commanded the Lawrence, a ship named for a recently killed captain of the American navy who had foLo13_2olishly lost one of the United States’ six powerful frigates in direct disobedience to orders.  Lawrence’s reckless conduct had pitched his awesome ship against one of the ablest captains and best trained crews in the British navy.  Lawrence’s ship the Chesapeake, was destroyed in less than fifteen minutes!  Stragely, Lawrence’s dying words, "Don’t give up the ship," caught on as a sort of battle cry among the American sailors ever after.  Even though Lawrence had foolishly put himself and his crew into a position where giving up their ship was inevitable, the phrase became almost as powerful as "Remember the Alamo" would decades later.  Because of this, as Oliver Hazard Perry sailed to confront the British Great Lakes fleet that day, his ship, the Lawrence, flew a flag that proudly stated, "Don’t Give Up the Ship!"

Although all the ships in the engagement were tiny by ocean-going standards, the Battle of Lake Erie would be the biggest, most violent naval engagement the Great Lakes would ever see. Perry sailed directly into the British ships and fought furiously.  The Lawrence was one of the two biggest, most powerful American ships on the Great Lakes.  The other one was called the Niagara.  For some reason, though, the Niagara didn’t engage in the battle.  It stood a ways off, out of harm’s way, and watched Perry get torn to shreds in the Lawrence.  Although Perry was fighting a losing battle, he had inflicted heavy casualties on five British ships at once, firing furiously and refusing to quit.

Finally, the Lawrence was almost a complete wreck.  Four-fifths of Perry’s men had been killed or wounded.  The gun deck was littered with bodies and refuse, the dead and dying sprawled everywhere. With so much death and destruction, hardly a gun was left firing aboard the Lawrence.  Still, from the mast of the ship flew the flag that said, "Don’t Give Up the Ship!" 

At this point in the battle, Perry did the unthinkable.  He lowered one of his 940only remaining ship’s boats into the water, and with a small contingent of men, he rowed away from the battle and toward the untouched Niagara, which was still watching the battle from a safe distance.  Perry and his men in the little boat were fired upon by the same cannon that had torn his ship to pieces.  However, many of the British ships were damaged badly enough that they neither destroyed his boat nor made much of an attempt to pursue.  Perhaps they thought the battle was over and Perry was fleeing the scene.  But as Perry reached the Niagara, he needed only moments to convince the crew to follow his orders instead of those of their timid captain.  The Niagara made sail and headed directly for the fleet of damaged British ships. 

It is interesting to imagine what the men aboard the British ships must have thought, seeing the heroics of this young captain and his bravery while rowing a boat through heavy enemy fire.  How their attitudes must have changed as they realized he was bringing a new ship to engage them!  And engage them he did.  With the fresh fire power of the Niagara brought to bear on the damaged British fleet, the outcome was not even a question.  The bravery of 18126p8Oliver Hazard Perry had won the day and secured the Great Lakes and the western frontier to the United States.  Throughout the remainder of the War of 1812, the British would never regain what they had lost that day.

Perry’s actions are impressive, given the bad advice he had flying from a flag staff aboard his ship.  Perry didn’t fall in love with the idea of winning the battle aboard his ship, committing to the chivalrous but silly notion that he should either win or sink on his ship.  Instead, he had victory in mind, a clear goal on the horizon for which he would change his plans and disregard the popular naval passions of his time.

It is interesting to think about Perry’s exploits that day in leadership terms.  What he did was nearly unprecedented in naval history, but is even more powerful as a metaphor for how a leader should attack a goal.  Many times, leaders set goals to accomplish something, and then profer plans to achieve that goal.  Somehow or somewhere along the way, however, the leader falls in love with the PLANS and gets overly committed to them at the expense of the goal.  As the saying goes, and as Perry so deftly demonstrated that day, Goals should be set in Stone, and Plans should be set in Sand.  If the plans arent’ working, scrap them and come up with more plans.  But never give up the goal!  If one ship isn’t working, get another ship, but be sure and get to the victory!

Oh, and by the way.  Don’t even ask me for the name of the original captain of the Niagara, who watched safely from a distance while his countrymen fought the battle; he doesn’t deserve to have history remember it.

 

Posted in

10 responses to “Goals in Stone, Plans in Sand”

  1. dean clouse Avatar
    dean clouse

    If my memory of history is accurate, then the other Captains name was Lily Livered Coward. Way to go Captain Perry! That’s the American way. When hope seems lost, keep fighting, and when hope is lost, row away to get a new weapon, even if you need to take it from a big guy with a little spine.

    Like

  2. Mike Mooney Avatar
    Mike Mooney

    Wow Chris! I absolutely loved that story! I loved it even more when you told it at the men’s leadership in STL! You are such a gifted orator and communicator, it really inspires me to improve in that area so that I may be as effective for the TEAM and for Christ as you are! I wanted to send you an article that I wrote and sent to some friends and family a couple months ago. I still am not sure how to send you things without simply replying to a post of yours, so I’ll continue this way, unless you have a preferred method of receiving things from individuals, in which case, just let me know. I realize that you have to be careful with your interactions due to your status and the sheer quantity of people who want attention from you, but I am going to use you and Orrin as mentors, until it’s acceptable to just call or email you. Just a goal of mine! I’m sure you had similar aspirations when you were in my shoes. Anyway, here’s the article. If you enjoy it, then mission accomplished. If you wish to use it in any way, feel free, but if you can’t, I completely understand. By the way, thanks for posting that fish picture! Talk about warm fuzzies!!! Enjoy your weekend!
    “I recently had a discussion with someone who I care a lot about and who is an “out” homosexual. She’s also a loud and proud liberal, politically speaking. The discussion was 3 hours long and lead me to the discovery that liberals and conservatives can NOT have a discussion that leads to an agreement because our foundations are based on different sets of PRINCIPLES, or more accurately, different sets of rules. Observing that there are three different sources for social discourse, I will lay a foundation for the lesson I just learned. The first source is Truth or “principles”, which are unvarying and can only be revealed by their author. They are not to be created, terminated or altered by humans because of their infinite value. The second is Fact or Information, which can be created, altered and improved on based on the amount of Truth that has been used in the formation of the facts. Facts are believed to be scientifically correct, but are often changed based on widening perspective gained by human experience. The final element is Perception or Opinion. It is fickle, fleeting and unstable. It is created, terminated and modified based on experience and emotion rather than principle and often bypasses the other two sources creating alternate realities, or, as I like to call it, the “Land of Pretend”. This is quite possibly the most deceiving and dangerous element in the human experience because behavioral programming is almost completely derived by our perception. When one perceives input to be true, the assumption that it is Truth causes one to accept it without question, study or counsel and to communicate is as Fact, thus creating a cycle of misinformation that can lead to negative consequences and further perceptive delusion. A personal encounter with conflicting principles that outweigh or outperform the perceived principles in a person’s defined reality is the only circumstance under which a person can decide that their principles may be fallible and temporal. I lay that foundation so as to show a substantially identifiable inability to successfully debate with a liberal due to a disparity in relationship to Truth. It is the equivalent of attempting to explain art with science. They do not explain each other as independent wholes; they can only be used together to achieve a balanced picture of a whole that is incomplete when either part is absent.
    The liberal argument of civil rights and social tolerance due to an amoral self-governance is very convincing because it sounds similar to Jesus’ message of love and acceptance and non-judgement, but it lacks the message of growth, maturity, wisdom and actual love. It is rooted in freedom to serve self rather than freedom to serve others or to know God and find a place of right-standing in His Kingdom. Life without moral boundaries is left to the pursuit of pleasure in place of the principles that have been formed by God and lead to true contentment and happiness; not because they always feel good, but because they lead us to destiny and purpose rather than subjecting us to “fate” and being victimized by the consequences of unwise living. The unfortunate conservative argument is that what is right is more important than personal choice, when the conservative view shouldn’t be an argument at all. It should be that having the choice and choosing principle over pleasure and convenience is more satisfying than self-serving gratification and amoral subjective relativity in behavioral foundation. As I already stated, this should not be an argument, rather than an example displayed through excellent living, passionate performance and undeniable peace that PASSES understanding. Ours is not to change others, but to show others that change is possible and even desirable, and that Truth is ours to be possessed.

    Like

  3. Brion Avatar
    Brion

    What a story. Goals in stone, plans in sand will stick in my mind for quite a while.
    Unfortunately many times in business, politics, and realationships it is the opposite: plans in stone, goals in sand. Peoples egos get so tied to plans they created. They want the credit more than any other result. Goals can change so quickly because they haven’t figured out which goal will give them the biggest benefit.
    Forget yourself! Be a Captain Perry! Lose yourself and you just might find something special…Thanks Chris!

    Like

  4. Liz Avatar
    Liz

    Wow. What an account. I have been so enjoying learning about these men (and women) who are ‘outside the boxers.’ They think in terms of necessity and priority as opposed to expectation or assumption. These famous stories of history have such relevance for my Sunday through Saturdays. This story gives me new resolve to change the plan a hundred times, if need be, in light of accomplishing the goal of raising my four sons into ‘men built for others.’ (That last BOM was wonderful–“Season of Life”)
    You ended your article with: “Goals should be set in Stone, and Plans should be set in Sand. (Do you make up a great quote like that? That is such a great statement.)
    Thanks for another goodie.
    Liz

    Like

  5. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Mel:
    Your attached article is incredibly interesting and, I believe, very accurate. The starting point of any debate determines a lot about how it will proceed. Beginning with wrong assumptions and then “arguing from there” is a favorite trick of people who don’t want their core, self-serving world-veiw attacked or debated. But one thing prevails through the entire realm of confusion of human thought, and that is that there IS TRUTH, ABSOLUTE TRUTH, and it comes only from God.
    Chris

    Like

  6. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Liz:
    Thanks for your comments, and thanks for thinking me smart enough to come up with such a great phrase! But I must confess, I heard it or read it elsewhere (only specifically where, I am not sure!)
    Thanks for reading and sharing on this blog. Keep leading and keep us posted on your leadership journey!
    Chris

    Like

  7. Chris Brady Avatar
    Chris Brady

    Brion:
    I believe you are right. People start out in pursuit of a goal, but then fall in love with their plans. They get more hung up on the Method than they do the Results. Thanks for sharing on this blog! I look forward to hearing more from you!
    Chris

    Like

  8. Bert Fall Avatar

    This is such a great story of courage. I’ve lived my whole life in Port Clinton, Ohio which is only a few miles from where the battle took place. I’ve always loved history and I often look through my window overlooking the lake and think about what it would have looked like on September 10th 1813. To this day myself and many others in the area have replicas of the flag that Commadore Perry flew. I’ve always felt the words “Don’t Give Up The Ship” meant never to give in to your enemy and to never lose sight of victory. I proudly dispayed that flag over my bunk when I was called to service in Iraq. I can honestly say that this story has given me more courage to do what was right than any other event in history. Probably because it is so close to home. If any of you are ever in the area, I recommend catching the ferry from Port Clinton to South Bass Island where you’ll find Perry’s Victory and International Peace Memorial. It’s a great place to get a feel for what happened during the battle. Not to mention it has a pretty nice view from the observation deck.

    Like

  9. dean clouse Avatar

    Bradyman, will you please let us know what books you get all this great history and battles from? If you don’t, I am going to steal all the information from your posts and write a book with your name on it and get it published! Ok, that was an empty threat, but you know I love history almost as much as science, and I am dying to get my hands on a good history book with some great battles in them! Thanks buddy.

    Like

  10. Phyllis Hoff Avatar
    Phyllis Hoff

    Hi Chris:
    I just wanted to thank you
    for such a wonderful seminar and sharing such wisdom with us in St. Louis. The Leading Leaders to Leadership book has been such a great inspiration for me. The quote “Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly” has taught me some invaluable lessons, both in my personal and professional life. Having your daily mentorship with the system is so powerful and rewarding. I just want to say Thank you.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mike Mooney Cancel reply