On Wednesday, all Americans who are engaged in pulling the cart paid in their taxes to those who ride in the cart. "Tea parties," reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party of 1773, which protested taxation that amounted to less than 2%, were staged in cities across the nation. Apparently the three readers of this blog are not the only ones fed up. Reader Joe Serra contributed the following photos, which I thought were clever and good for a laugh. If only they weren't so true! Enjoy. (Click on any individual picture to enlarge).
-
My team partner and co-author Orrin Woodward posted on his blog a nice review of our Launching a Leadership Revolution book from world-famous leadership expert Oliver Demille. This is especially pleasing to read because Terri and I have long been fans of DeMille and his incredible book A Thomas Jefferson Education. The book so inspired us that for years now we have been following its principles in the home schooling of our children. I would like to not only thank him for the kind comments but also express my gratitude for his example of leadership in action. America needs more leaders like him!
Happy Easter weekend everyone! Christ is risen!
-
Way back before Alan Greenspan became Chairman of the Federal Reserve, he penned a now famous essay for inclusion in Ayn Rand's book, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. In the article, Greenspan explains the stability and logic behind a gold-standard-based money system, and then makes the following observation:
"But the opposition to the gold standard in any form — from a growing number of welfare-state advocates — was prompted by a much subtler insight: the realization that the gold standard is incompatible with chronic deficit spending (the hallmark of the welfare state). Stripped of its academic jargon, the welfare state is nothing more than a mechanism by which governments confiscate the wealth of the productive members of a society to support a wide variety of welfare schemes."
Two major points can be seen in this small excerpt:
1. our government does not want a sound money system because it would not allow them to get away with deficit spending
2. inflation and deficit spending are a hidden way the government can take from the productive and give to the free-loaders
Our nation is in an idealogical war between those who want to ride in the cart and those who are pulling it. For too long the cart-pullers have allowed themselves to become loaded down with sneaky, subtle, guilt-inflicting, victim-mentality, falsely-compassionate, welfare-state-minded free-loaders. Ayn Rand, never one to pull a punch, called these free-loaders "looters."
The original rebellion in the American colonies was instigated by less than 2% taxation! Assuming anyone reading this is a cart-puller and not a free-loader, your likely level of taxation is somewhere between 48 and 64%, once considering federal income tax, property tax, Social Security, Medicare, school and local taxes, sales taxes, gasoline taxes, telephone taxes, tolls, licenses and fees, and in many cases state income tax.
According to author and political commentator Amity Schlaes, fully 40% of the U.S. population are now riding in the cart.
This can not go on much longer.
-
Watching the death of freedom is heartbreaking. This magnificent construct called the United States of America was built by a collection of talent the likes of which world has rarely seen. For a crowded moment in time, in a small strip of sea-side colonies, some of the greatest minds ever assembled put aside their sundry differences and collaborated to produce an experiment in government that literally changed the world. Whether or not you are an American citizen reading this, it is unarguable that you have been affected by what those men did two and a half centuries ago.
What the United States founding fathers accomplished was something that had never been done before, and although often copied, has never been duplicated. Their Constitution, and the Bill of Rights upon which the ratification of the Constitution hinged, are literally works of art. They satisfy every concept of the term: 1) solving a complex problem 2) doing so elegantly 3) and moving the audience while in the process. This work of art was chiseled out of the Judeo-Christian world-view, founded upon a strong distrust of government power, polished with the principles of justice for all, and finished with the sanctity of the individual and his or her right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This masterpiece was then bestowed upon the people as a guardian of their freedoms against governmental tyranny.
Today, however, the administration in Washington and its Congress are defacing this work of art as though it were just another dusty heirloom. I heard one analogy that it's as if the teenagers have taken over the principle's office; weilding the power without any understanding of how it got there or what it is for. For some reason, in a cruder illustration, my mind goes back to the old Kevin Costner movie Dances with Wolves, in which a disenfranchised Civil War veteran finds himself in love with an Indian woman. Throughout the middle of the movie Costner's character writes a beautiful and moving diary of his feelings and experiences but loses it as he is re-captured by his countrymen. In a display of arrogance and insolence, one of the soldiers, unable to read, used the diary as tiolet paper.
Every time I think of that analogy it strikes me as somewhat offensive, and perhaps it is a bit too strong for use here. But I use it to demonstrate a simple truth: ignorance destroys beauty. What is happening in Washington right now can only be described as ignorance. If it is not ignorance, then it must be something much worse, for who would knowingly and in full understanding trample something so beautiful?
There are many fronts on which we could discuss the new and proposed policies coming out of Washington:
1. Moral grounds (as in, It's not Right!)
2. Grounds of Fairness (as in, it's not Fair!)
3. Constitutional Grounds (as in, it's not Authorized!)
These would all warrant complete articles of their own. These three, however, are easily opposed by people with strange world-views. Without a Judeo-Christian ethos, moral grounds become relative, and without absolutes, who's to say what's moral? For someone playing the victim card, the second one disappears as such a person only wants justice for them and not justice for all. For power-lovers the Constitution can easily be trampled in the name of expediency. So, arguments for these three reasons often fall upon deaf ears.
The fourth front, however, is unarguable, or should be. It is supported by history, facts, and adequate experimentation around the world. The fourth category is:
4. Pragmatics (as in, it's not workable!)
Even if we leave off speaking about moral absolutes, fairness and justice, and the constructs of law through the Constitution and Bill of Rights, we are still left with the extremely important understanding of what works. And quite simply, the policies being passed into law in Washignton right now do not work. Outrageous government spending (which, by the way, happened to catastrophic levels under George W. Bush's adminstration, as well), does not stimulate the economy, but wrecks it. Abortion does not help a society, it destroys it. Befriending terrorists does not appease them, it emboldens them. Celebrating diversity does not unite, it divides. Nationalizing private industry does not lead to productivty gains, but to the death of competitiveness. Nationalizing health care does not lead to better care for all, but to worse care for most. Eliminating guns does not lead to less gun crime, just less protection against gun crimes.
I could go further, but my point should be clear. These things are not theories left untried, but are a compilation of failed policies from other nations and history that have crashed miserably every time they've been tried! As I have said before in this blog, Why must we repeat bad policy just to make sure it's still bad?
Ignorance, my friends.
Or worse.
-
The folks over at Obstacles Press have done it again! They have just launched a new website promoting co-author Orrin Woodward and my book, Leadership: Tidbits and Treasures. I hope you enjoy it!
-
Whenever modern situations become worrisome, it is nearly always instructive to peer back into history for perspective and understanding. With the crazy, off-the-wall economic policies of the current United States government, there are many historical events from which one can draw context. One such moment in time is the monarchy of Spain during the 1500s. See for yourself if there are not parallels inumerous.

In the late 1400's, explorations for gold and passages to the east produced the discovery of what became known as the New World. Spain quickly edged out Portugal as the dominant player in this game throughout much of the 1500s, and literally tons of gold and silver made its way across the Atlantic from the infamous Spanish Main in Mexico, Latin and South America to the coffers in Seville, Spain. There were many unfortunate effects of this, such as the near total decimation of the Inca and Mayan native populations, as well as the instigation of the African slave trade. First the natives, and increasingly so the Africans, were needed to man the mines. As a result of this system, massive amounts of gold and silver were hauled across the Atlantic and into Europe. Some estimates say that this amount was so enormous that the total of precious metal in Europe at the end of the 1500s was more than five times what it was at the beginning of that century when the New World was discovered!It would be logical to deduce that Spain became one of the richest nations in the world as a result of this massive influx of wealth. But interestingly, and very educationally, this was not the case.What happened?Author Peter L. Bernstein writes:"Once the gold began arriving in quantity, the Spanish were far more proficient at spending than at producing. The massive imports of gold and silver stimulated the spending skills at the same time that they stifled Spain's incentive to produce. Spain acted like a poor man who makes a great windfall at the gambling tables but comes to believe that the money is his destiny rather than a nonrecurring event . . . . Late in the century the . . . Parliament declared, 'The more of [gold] that comes in, the less the Kingdom has. . . Though our kingdoms should be the richest in the world . . . they are the poorest, for they are only a bridge for [the gold and silver] to go to the Kindgdoms of our enemies.' Another Spanish observer, Pedro de Valencia, wrote, 'So much silver and money . . . always has been fatal poison to republics and cities. They believe money will keep them and it is not true: plowed fields, pastures, and fisheries are what give sustenance.' Gold has always been associated with power. Once the kings of Spain realized how much new wealth the discoveries of gold in the American colonies would bring them, they convinced themselves that their wealth was great enough to bend the world to their will.'"An apt analogy would be of 'second generation wealth.' It is almost a cliche that sons squander their father's wealth, thinking that they have somehow, by eating at the same table, sleeping under the same roof, and being sufficiently 'talked at' by the patriarch, been bestowed the 'magic touch' which their father used to produce the wealth in the first place. The squandering of the father's empire in such cases is so common as to be almost a rule. This is because there is no 'touch' of greatness, nor family superiority, nor endowments or bestowed rights, there are only the laws of success. And those laws are almost immediately broken by a son taking over the reigns of a great empire for which he was not forced to labor to create nor strive to earn. The violation of the earning principle produces harsh results and even harsher lessons. Sorry golden boys.Another comparison, and the one that inspired this article, is made to the current United States government and its hubris and arrogance in thinking it has found its own Spanish Main in the printing of free money by the Federal Reserve banking scam (er, um, I mean banking system). Having arranged for itself a tidy little sitaution in which it can produce currency out of nothing, the government has taken to acting like the monarch of sixteenth century Spain, with figurative ships laden with "bailout money" and "earmarks." Our bureaucratic government has taken leave of its senses in a 'gold fever' all its own creation, thinking it can disdain major industrial and agricultural infrastructures while gifting billions of dollars in bailouts to its partners in banking complicit in its schemes. Worse, it seems to think it can foist this on an American citizenry without ramifications, as though Americans are naive Incas or backward Mayans.Tellingly, however, the Incas were not naive, only trusting. The Mayans were not backwards, only fooled into thinking the Spaniards were gods. Today, Americans, or at least some of them, seem to be falling into the same traps of the Incas and the Mayans: too trusting of the government, and somehow duped into believing in political messiahs. To continue such foolishness will result in the same fate as the indiginous peoples of Latin and South America; decimation.But America cannot stand upon its stolen spending power any more than Spain could stand upon its stolen treasure. Wealth unearned bears with it a curse. Instead, as Peter Schiff said, "Consumption is made possible by production and credit is made possible by
savings." Government economic shenanigans are no substitute, but rather a drug taken to defer the pain until later, at which time the pain is even greater. -

In an increasingly advanced effort to show its total lack of respect for the Constitution and private contracts, and its extreme arrogance and hubris, the U.S. government has forced General Motors head Rick Wagoner to resign as a condition for the company receiving a government LOAN. According to an article on Politico, in all it's unfounded wisdom, knowledge, and experience in running industries, the government has formed a "task force" that will be responsible for dictating to General Motors what changes it should make, how high it should jump, and how exactly it should dance in the street with government bullets flying toward its feet (oh, I almost forgot, bullets aren't available anymore)."The Obama administration calls its task force “a cabinet-level group that includes the secretaries of Transportation, Commerce, Labor and Energy. It will also include the chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, the EPA administrator, and the director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change. The Task Force will be led by Treasury Secretary [Tim] Geithner and [National Economic Council] Director Larry Summers.”Wow. I feel much better now. Just knowing all those bureaucrats are on the scene now will help me sleep soundly. I'm sure that they will be more effective than the highly admired Rick Wagoner of 30 years experience on the front lines.AMERICA, have we lost our minds?WHY are we letting the government take over the direction and leadership of our private industry?WHY do these bureaucrats think they have the authority? I certainly can't find it in any of our founding documents!WHY do they think they are qualified? I have never seen such arrogance in my entire life! (and that's saying something, belive me!)Let me see, the government causes much of what's going on in this bad economy because of their insane economic policies. Then they say they are going to "bail us out" with even more lunatic economic policies. When this makes matters worse, and the very industries that have won us our freedom in past wars and have generated long-term jobs and lifestyle for MILLIONS of Americans, are dying on the vine because of it, then they DARE dictate terms to the struggling companies?This is like shooting a father and taking over his family because he is unfit to provide for them!Has anybody read Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand? It's just as she predicted. Only it hurts more when it's not fictitous, and you see freedom being murdered in real life.As spoken by Rand's government crony purchasing manager to the industrial magnate hero: "No Mr. Reardon, it's one or the other. Either you're good at running the mills, or you're good at running to Washington."It's one or the other, folks: bigger freedom, or bigger government.The two cannot co-exist. -
It's a busy world, but that's no excuse.
Take time to think.There are bills to pay and mouths to feed, but that's no excuse.Take time to think.I've got to run, I'm late already, but that's no excuse.Take time to think.Can't stop now. More time tomorrow. But that's no excuse.Take time to think.All I'm saying is . . .think about it.
















